Well, well, well… remember how it was just ‘racist misinformation’ that the African who stabbed little girls at a dance party in Britain was a jihadi terrorist?
Except that, as we now learn, he’d not only cooked up the deadly nerve toxin ricin but also had an al-Qaeda training manual.
Which is totally not the sort of stuff a would-be terrorist would do. Just ask the British police.
British police says the teenager charged with the murder of three young girls attending a dance studio in Southport may not have been carrying out a terrorist attack even though he has now been charged with possessing a military al-Qaeda training manual and had manufactured the deadly poison, ricin.
No, he may have just been going shopping when those darn kids fell on his knife. After all, it’s as British as tea and scones to own Muslim terror manuals.
Merseyside police on Tuesday insisted that the deadly attack on the young girls at the Taylor Swift-themed class on July 29 has not been declared a terrorist incident because the police had not yet ascertained a motive.
To make it worse, both these facts were known immediately after the terror attack, when police raided the killer’s family home. Yet, they deliberately kept it from the public, while police and the Starmer government lied through their teeth.
Unbelievably, in spite of the literally bleeding obvious, they’re still trying to keep the snow-job going.
The actions of the accused, Cardiff born Axel Rudakubana, prompted widespread riots and police charged more than 1000 people after it was spread on social media, wrongly, that he had been an asylum seeker and radical Islamist.
‘Cardiff born.’ Right. Cos he’s as Welsh as Tom Jones and Shirley Bassey. It’s only slightly wrong that he is an asylum seeker himself: both his parents are. And don’t forget the Islamic terror manual – Military studies in the jihad against the tyrants: The al-Qaeda training manual. So, the ‘far right’ were more right than the lying media and double-speaking police.
Double-speak, did I say? Like this astonishing display:
Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said: “At this time, Counter-Terrorism Policing has not declared the events of July 29 a terrorist incident.
“I recognise that these new charges may lead to speculation. The matter for which Axel Rudakubana has been charged under the Terrorism Act doesn’t require motive to be established.
“For a matter to be declared a terrorist incident, motivation would need to be established.”
Under current British law for an incident to be declared a terrorist attack it must involve the use or threat of serious violence, or serious damage to property, be designed to influence the government, to intimidate the public or a section of the public, and be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.
Rudakubana has now been charged with the production of a biological toxin, contrary to section one of the Biological Weapons Act 1984, and possessing the manual under section 58 of the Terrorism Act in addition to the murder and attempted murder charges.
Is there something we missed, between the charges under the Terrorism Act, the murder of little girls and the Islamic terrorist training manual? Hello?
