Table of Contents
Good Oil readers often comment, ‘Why can’t we have a politician like Pauline Hanson?’ To which I say: maybe if you take Jacinda Ardern back, we’ll think about it. In the meantime, though, I ask myself why Australia can’t have more politicians like Rupert Lowe?
The single biggest reason the supposedly ‘conservative’ Liberal-National coalition in Australia has so rapidly collapsed into irrelevance is because they surrendered their souls and their party to the so-called ‘moderates’. Far from actually moderate, these woke-riche loons are dripping-wet wannabe Greens, in the mould of the pompous Sun King, Malcolm Turnbull. Turnbull’s sole political achievement was to knife a genuine centre-right conservative, Tony Abbott, and consequently turn a landslide victory into near-defeat in a single term of government.
But the only reason Turnbull was able to knife Abbott was because Abbott made the same fatal mistake nearly every centre-right conservative has, for the last few decades: he was afraid of the legacy media.
Rupert Lowe is making no such mistakes. When the legacy media play their usual hit-piece games, Lowe simply proudly claims it as an endorsement – to the delight of his rapidly growing supporter base. Take, for instance, this attempted hit-piece by the Times:
Restore Britain’s key policies are mass deportations by removing the entire illegal migration population of the UK, force the NHS to employ British nationals over foreign nationals, abolish the asylum system, restore a “pro-British” education system, repeal the Online Safety Act and “end political Islam”.
Where, exactly, are Britons supposed to be upset about any of that? As Lowe responds: Well, yes? Problem?
Similarly, when another legacy media journalist accused Lowe of wanting to deport a million foreigners, he hit back with: ‘No, we’ll deport far more than that’. The luvvy left can clutch their pearls all they like: more and more Britons are listening and liking what they hear.
Most importantly, Lowe is not, like everyone from the legacy media to the political establishment and to the freaking Pope fer chrissakes, a suicidally besotted Islamophile.
We have been quite clear that a Restore Britain Government would be far more muscular in our approach to Islam.
This is a Christian country. Under a Restore Britain Government, it would stay that way.
Halal slaughter would be banned, along with cousin marriage and the wearing of the burqa/niqab.
Sharia courts outlawed, with any foreign nationals attempting to promote Islamism removed from our country.
Mass dominating Islamic prayer in public spaces will not be tolerated.
Islamic call to prayer blaring out across British towns will be banned.
Unfettered immigration from Islamic countries will come to an end.
Stop, stop: there’s only so much good news I can take. But, no, Uncle Rupert’s not letting up.
Foreign nationals who cannot speak English, refuse to work, claim benefits, live in social housing, or hate Britain will also be deported.
Under a Restore Britain Government, the British state would not bend over backwards to accommodate practices that would have been unwelcome in medieval England.
The Islamification of Britain will end […]
My one objective with Restore Britain is to leave the country in a better state than the one my generation was gifted.
It’s almost too late. The list of once-Christian countries now living under the Islamic yoke of violence and repression is long and instructive. Few more so than Lebanon, which was majority Christian in my own lifetime. Then they made the fatal mistake the West has made: opening the gates to Islam, under the fatal delusion of ‘empathy’. Now, Lebanon is just another Islamic hellhole, riddled with terror.
Many European countries are fast flushing themselves into the same sewer. Even at just a few per cent of the population, Muslims in Western countries are already demanding sharia law. As Canadian evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad has said, can you imagine what they’ll be like at 15 per cent, 20 per cent of the population?
But all this is just the beginning of Restore’s comprehensive policy agenda of what, even just 20 years ago, would have been purely conventional politics.
At the heart of Restore Britain’s agenda is a radical overhaul of immigration. The plan advocates for the, “largest deportation programme ever seen in Britain”, to remove undocumented migrants, coupled with the complete abolition of the asylum system. The goal is, “net negative immigration”, meaning significantly more people would leave the UK than arrive.
Beyond outright deportation, the policies target foreign nationals who cannot speak English, live in social housing, claim benefits, or are not working. A particularly sharp edge is the proposal for an, “immigration ‘Red List’”, closing visa routes from countries deemed to supply, “illegals, criminals and sex pests”, explicitly stating, “We will discriminate” […]
Voting rights for foreign nationals would be removed, and foreign language translation services would be ended across public services, including the NHS, under the principle of, “You live in England, you speak English” […]
Medical school caps would be demolished for British students, prioritising them over foreign staff. Free car parking would be implemented for NHS staff, patients, and visitors.
Other public service reforms include defunding the BBC, making it a subscription service, and scrapping, “arbitrary foreign aid targets”. Defence would see Britain, “rebuild and rearm”, with a, “big stick”, waved when desired, and a comprehensive support system for veterans, including fast-tracked recruitment into immigration enforcement roles.
Can we get even a fraction of this? Is it really too much to ask?
