Table of Contents
As Good Oil readers will be aware, I’ve frequently documented how activist judges and tribunals have turned the justice system into a revolving door for predators. The pattern is now so blatant it barely shocks any more. That doesn’t mean we should avert our gazes or stop demanding accountability.
Especially when, week after week, fresh cases still manage to turn the stomach.
A judge was condemned on Thursday for a 'sickening case of soft justice' after a teenage traveller gang who raped two lone schoolgirls were spared jail.
The precociously predatory Pikeys raped multiple girls over months, laughing and filming the attacks, committed at knifepoint. All three were convicted of rape. The older two were also found guilty of taking indecent images of a child.
Enter the tilty-headed judges.
At sentencing in Southampton Crown Court, Judge Nicholas Rowland told them they had ‘done very well’ dealing with restrictions imposed during the trial. The two older boys received three-year youth rehabilitation orders instead of prison. The youngest got 18 months. All three were given 10-year restraining orders.
‘None of you need to go to prison today,’ the judge said, before reeling off a list of reasons exactly why they should.
He said they were very young, had low intelligence, a limited understanding of consent and were susceptible to peer pressure.
Those aren’t excuses, you be-wigged cretin.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: ‘These despicable youths should have been jailed. This is a sickening case of soft justice.
‘Repeated gang rapes against schoolgirls deserve the harshest penalties – as a punishment and as a deterrent. This soft judge is sending a signal that these appalling crimes will go without proper punishment, encouraging other offenders.’
Except that everyone, especially gang rapists, have already been getting that signal, loud and clear, from the British establishment for years.
This is the same judicial mindset I’ve repeatedly highlighted. Recall the satanic paedophile ring where one judge granted bail to the ringleader while another fretted over “depravity” but still let the system bend over backwards for the offenders. Or the case where a predator was effectively told the victim should accommodate him. The priority is never the victim. It is always the offender’s “rehabilitation”, “youth” or “low intelligence”.
If only it were just in Britain that these egregious judicial jack-offs fawned over perverts and predators. Our own beaks and bureaucrats are just as bad.
A former school employee who allegedly pulled a student into a storeroom before masturbating in front of her is now allowed to work with children in Orange again.
The former school employee who allegedly pulled a 16-year-old female student into a storeroom, exposed himself and masturbated in front of her, while sending her sexually explicit Snapchat messages and photos, has duly been granted a Working With Children Check clearance.
As part of the appeal process, the applicant met with forensic psychiatrist Jeremy O’Dea via audio-visual link for the purpose of the doctor preparing a report.
In his report, Dr O’Dea concluded the applicant has a “relatively low risk of committing a sex offence against a female child” particularly if he remained abstinent from drug and alcohol use.
Although the tribunal did not dismiss the allegations made against the applicant as “groundless”, it considered whether the allegation gave rise to a “present risk to the safety of children”.
Well, there’s an easy way to test that assertion: force the psychiatrist and the tribunal members to let him babysit their own daughters. Then we’ll quickly see whether they really believe he’s no risk. Failing that, it’s long past time we start jailing the judges, or at the very least stripping them of the power to make these calls.
Otherwise, the soft justice will continue. And more girls will pay the price.
