As I wrote recently, the Australian legacy media are sooking because organisers of this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference in Brisbane made them wear “Fake News” lanyards. Frankly, given the legacy media’s deplorable record of half-truths and outright lies, they should be glad they weren’t subjected to a ritual tarring-and-feathering by all in attendance.
In few things will the legacy media lie harder than when it comes to running cover for imported rapists and murderers who’ve slithered into Western countries from cesspits of the Third World. Remember the ‘Maryland Dad’, who turned out to be an illegal immigrant and human trafficker and sported the tattoos of El Salvador’s notorious gangs? Gangs who take their tattoos so seriously that they’ll kill anyone wearing them who’s not a member – and the price of admission is notching up at least one murder.
Undeterred, the legacy media is still trying on the same gambit of lying to our faces about the dregs of migrant criminals. Such as an ‘alleged’ baby killer in Brisbane.
A Pakistani kebab shop worker has been charged with murder after his three-month-old son died of severe internal injuries in a Brisbane hospital.
Uneed Ullah, 28, brought the infant to Ipswich hospital on October 1, but the baby was transferred to the Queensland Children’s Hospital due to the severity of his injuries. He was put on life support and died on Tuesday afternoon.
Ullah, who was the only one home when the baby was injured, was then arrested and charged with one count of murder.
Despite the horrific (alleged!) crime – police and hospital staff alluded only obliquely to the “nature” of the internal injuries – the legacy media lost no time in trying to pull the wool over our eyes. “Queensland dad”, said the Courier-Mail. Not to be outdone, the ABC wittered that he was an “Ipswich father”.
Note that these aren’t exactly untrue, but not all fake news is outright falsehood. In fact, the more common and damaging type of fake news is where the facts are misrepresented and/or headlines slanted to try and push a particular narrative. In this case, concealing the immigrant background of the (alleged!) baby murderer.
The British legacy media are old hands at this kind of deception, of course.
Bradford man tried to rape ‘dying or dead’ woman in tent.
A court has heard how a homeless woman who was dying or already dead was the victim of an attempted rape attack in a tent in Bradford city centre.
To further the deception, the report originally gave the necrophilic rapist’s name as “Shaw”. It was only later amended to his correct name: Shah.
A jury at Bradford Crown Court heard today (Mon) how Hassan Shah was captured on CCTV going into the victim’s tent on Kirkgate on the morning of November 8.
After lying next to the unconscious woman, the 26-year-old pulled down her clothing without making any effort to communicate with her.
“During the entire incident you will see that (the complainant) does not move,” Mr Wright told the jury ahead of playing them some of the pixelated CCTV footage.
“The reason that she did not move is that she was either dying or in fact dead at the time.”
And still no mention that the “Bradford man” is, according to social media accounts, a Muslim migrant.
The jury were told that a judge had already ruled that due to Shah’s low IQ and a learning disability he was ‘unfit to plead’ and he was not present at court today for a hearing to decide if he ‘did the acts’ alleged against him.
Well, there’s the problem then: obviously because of his low IQ and “learning disability”, he probably wasn’t able to read the British government’s helpful pamphlets.
They’ll have to print a whole new run, too, informing migrants that raping corpses is just another of the many things that are inexplicably illegal in infidel Britain.