Skip to content

Your Daily Ten@10 - 2026/063

10 News Stories They Chose Not to Tell You

This is edition 2026/063 of the Ten@10 newsletter.

Hi all,

This is the Ten@10, where I collate and summarise ten news items you generally won't see in the mainstream media.

Enjoy!


1. When Police go into business with Netflix

Bryce Edwards

  • 🎬 A controversy has erupted over Netflix partnering with New Zealand Police to produce a documentary on the Tom Phillips case while the investigation was still ongoing, raising ethical concerns.
  • 🕵️ Investigative reporting by Paddy Gower and Sam Sherwood exposed previously withheld emails and forced admissions from the Police Commissioner.
  • 📅 A troubling timeline shows Police Commissioner Richard Chambers","New Zealand Police Commissioner engaged with the documentary producer even before officially starting his role, contradicting earlier public statements.
  • 🤝 The documentary’s producer Karen Rutherford had direct access to Chambers and connections to Police Minister Mark Mitchell, highlighting privileged access unavailable to ordinary media.
  • 🎥 Dame Julie Christie and her company NHNZ were deeply embedded with police operations, receiving exclusive access while other journalists were kept at a distance.
  • 📰 Concerns emerged among journalists that police may have favored filmmakers to better control the narrative, prioritizing a commercial product over public-interest reporting.
  • 🔄 A “revolving door” between media and police communications staff blurred independence, notably involving Claire Trevett transitioning from political editor to police communications.
  • 💬 Internal communications revealed unusually close and informal relationships between police staff and filmmakers, suggesting partiality rather than neutrality.
  • ⚠️ A senior police official advised the producer to avoid written communication due to Official Information Act discoverability, raising serious transparency concerns.
  • 📄 The handling of Official Information Act (OIA) requests was inconsistent and misleading, with key details—like Netflix’s involvement—initially withheld or misrepresented.
  • 🔍 A pattern emerged where damaging information was only released after sustained journalistic pressure, undermining trust in police transparency and accountability.
  • 🚨 Overall, the situation raises broader concerns about police neutrality, media access fairness, and the ethics of turning active investigations into commercial entertainment.

This post is for subscribers on the VIP tier

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In

Latest

The Good Oil Daily Opinion Poll

The Good Oil Daily Opinion Poll

Take our Daily Opinion Poll and see how your views compare to other readers and then share the poll on social media. By sharing the poll you will help even more readers to discover The Good Oil.

Members Public