Table of Contents
Even as the Southport terror attack inquiry delivers its findings, the taxpayer-funded left-wing propaganda collective ABC is still trying to muddy the waters. The ‘national broadcaster’ is hell-bent on perpetrating exactly the conspiracy of silence that not only led to the unrest following the attack, but allowed the attack to happen in the first place.
Make no mistake: this is a terrorist enormity that “could and should have been prevented”. The report levels damning criticism at both the murderer’s parents and officials who did nothing about his alarming behaviour.
Adrian Fulford, a retired judge who led a nine-week inquiry into the attack, issued a 763-page report on Monday, local time, cataloguing the many times parents or authorities could have intervened in Axel Rudakubana’s life to ultimately prevent him from carrying out killings.
Mr Fulford said the killings were unprecedented in the UK for their “extreme and very particular depravity”.
“Unprecented”? As if the Manchester bombing never happened? Or every other Islamic enormity.
“One of the most striking conclusions from this inquiry’s extensive investigation is the sheer number of missed opportunities over many years to intervene meaningfully, which directly contributed to the failure to avert this disaster,” he said.
“The consequences were catastrophic.”
Rudakubana, who was 17 when he carried out the attack, is serving a life sentence with no chance of parole for 52 years for killing Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Bebe King, six, and wounding eight other children and two adults.
And here come the White Knights of the ABC, swinging in with their mighty swords of malinformation. Malinformation is information that is true, but misleading. It is presented out of context and used selectively to distort public perception.
Like this:
The attack at Southport in north-western England triggered days of disorder, after far-right activists seized on incorrect reports that the attacker was a Muslim migrant who had recently arrived in the UK.
Rudakubana was born in Wales to Rwandan Christian parents.
What the ABC isn’t telling us is that Rudakubana was found with an al Qaeda manual. And the ‘far-right activists’ were, in fact, mostly just fed up ordinary Britons – and they weren’t entirely wrong about the migrant angle, either. And who can blame them for leaping to not-quite-right conclusions, when it was blatantly obvious that the legacy media were hiding something from the start.
The cover-up is still going on, when it comes to the killer’s family.
During that same period, police were called to his home five times over unspecified concerns about his behaviour […]
While Mr Fulford outlined several failings by Rudakubana’s parents that could have prevented the tragedy, he said they should not be vilified for what had become a challenging situation.
“Their life at home must have become little short of a nightmare given, to use the words of his own father, AR had turned into a ‘monster’.”
So, why did his parents lie to social workers and why didn’t they report his obsession with knives and his stash of deadly weapons, including the poison ricin?
But nearly everything about his parents, and the circumstances of their arrival in the UK from the Rwandan genocide, remains a complete official mystery. Their presence in official records is almost completely absent.
Restore Britain MP Rupert Lowe wants to know what is being kept secret.
I want to know exactly why Axel Rudakubana’s family came to the UK – on what visa, for what reason […]
It is my view that the police should urgently investigate both the mother and the father of that monster, prosecuting/deporting where possible.
Plenty more people ought to be facing accountability, too. Not least the clearly useless Prevent.
Police, social workers and educators were well aware of problems with Rudakubana.
In 2019, aged 13, he was convicted of assaulting another child at school with a hockey stick and placed under the supervision of a local service for youth offenders.
He was referred to the government's anti-extremism program, Prevent, three times between 2019 and 2021 for expressing interest in school shootings, the 2017 London Bridge attack, the Irish Republican Army and the Middle East.
Each time, the case was closed because he was not considered susceptible to becoming a terrorist.
That tells us all we need to know about exactly how much use Prevent, and other ‘de-radicalisation’ programmes, really are.
“Far too often, AR’s ‘case’ was passed from one public sector agency to another in an inappropriate merry-go-round of referrals, assessments, case-closures and ‘hand-offs,’” said Mr Fulford, who only used the killer’s initials.
Mr Fulford highlighted an incident in March 2022 when Rudakubana was caught on a bus with a knife, told police he wanted to stab someone and admitted trying to make poison.
That should have sparked an arrest that would likely have led to a search of his house and the discovery of seeds he had bought to make biological toxin ricin and terrorist material downloaded on his computer, Mr Fulford said.
If police had put just a fraction of the effort into this case than they do into arresting people for memes, three little girls would still be alive.
But the British establishment long ago decided to prioritise ‘diversity’ above the lives of little British girls.
