Skip to content

Collapsing The Narrative

The very thought of normal people gaining access to primary sources is hateful because it means there is no place for court historians.

Look, I distrust anyone who claims to know what happened in the 20th century – the Golden Age of Lies. But the allergic reaction to Tucker Carlson’s recent interview shows that the regime is struggling to defend its lies in the internet age.

A good rule of thumb, post-1945, is that all historians who have a public profile are court historians. Their job is to construct the regime’s narrative. Court historians absolutely loathe revisionist historians. It’s not that revisionists are working with different material – anyone can read the primary sources. Rather, the problem is that history is not a science. History is a branch of literature. And as such, historians of any stripe are under no obligation to tell the truth.

This post is for subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In

Latest

Face of the Day

Face of the Day

The author, who has sold more than 300 million books worldwide, had been signing books and meeting fans until the day before his death.

Members Public
The Good Oil Word of the Day

The Good Oil Word of the Day

The word for today is… soothsayer (noun) - : a person who predicts the future by magical, intuitive, or more rational means : prognosticator Source : Merriam-Webster Etymology : The origins are straightforward: a soothsayer is someone who says sooth. You may, however, find that less than enlightening! Sooth is an archaic word meaning

Members Public