Skip to content

Fishing Reserves Hijacked by Co-governance Agenda

man in white shirt and black shorts fishing on sea during daytime
Photo by Vladimir Haltakov. The BFD

Table of Contents

David Seymour
ACT Leader


The Government’s plan to roll out more fishing reserves will be welcomed by some, but it shouldn’t be used to smuggle in a co-governance agenda.

Revitalising the Gulf is the latest example of the Government’s drive to give power to people based on who their grandparents were through co-governance.

A fishing reserve is not a cultural construct, it’s just a place where fishing is banned to give fish a chance. There is no need for special Maori knowledge. We can all see that if you stop catching fish in certain areas there will be more of them.

Not only is co-management unnecessary, but it is also divisive. It can only mean that some people will get a greater say, and perhaps greater rights according to who their grandparents were.

There is no doubt there will be a rahui here and a customary catch there, meaning reserves are not created equal for all people.

Fish don’t do race. The protection of the Hauraki Gulf should be based on good science to maximise fishing opportunities for all New Zealanders.

ACT supports marine reserves, but allowing some Maori to customary take in a fishing reserve makes the policy more about race than fishing.

Please share so others can discover The BFD.

Latest

Sean Plunket On The Latest Mumbo Jumbo From The BSA

Sean Plunket On The Latest Mumbo Jumbo From The BSA

If you have a great Youtube, Rumble or Vimeo video to share send it to videos@goodoil.news If you're loving this trusty, straight-up news on Kiwi politics and beyond, why not become a paid member, eh? Unlock exclusive yarns, podcasts, vids, and in-depth analysis—your support keeps

Members Public
Good Oil Backchat

Good Oil Backchat

Please read our rules before you start commenting on The Good Oil to avoid a temporary or permanent ban.

Members Public