When a professional body removes a peer-reviewed article because it conflicts with organisational values, the issue is no longer a single publication, but the future of open inquiry, editorial independence, and professional disagreement.
Take our Daily Opinion Poll and see how your views compare to other readers and then share the poll on social media. By sharing the poll you will help even more readers to discover The Good Oil.
Do you think minorities will ease up on the demands when they become the majority?
How the media creates political momentum
New Zealand voters are clearly latching on to the same trend, in which the traditional major parties are haemorrhaging support, like most other Western democracies.
“It’s up to political leaders, community leaders, business leaders, everybody to manage their own rhetoric.”
“We honour our commitments in free trade agreements.”
“A scholarly journal is meant to be a place where ideas are tested, not a channel for value signalling.”
“I will cooperate fully with the investigation and look forward to having this matter dealt with.”
Opportunity is receiving the kind of attention “you can’t even pay for”.
“Public pressure is working.”
Co-governance is quietly reshaping our democracy through stealthy administrative shifts rather than open legislative debate.
Peters is not backing off. The others would be smart to start paying attention.
Help fund Ian Wishart’s High Court appeals challenging inaccurate climate reporting, demanding greater media accountability.
Please read our rules before you start commenting on The Good Oil to avoid a temporary or permanent ban.
