AI Designs New Viruses (and in Theory, Bioweapons)
This is not a race we can afford to lose.
This is not a race we can afford to lose.
South Korean prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for a woman accused of killing two men with drug-spiked drinks after allegedly using ChatGPT to research potentially fatal combinations of medication and alcohol.
Generative AI threatens to upend citizen science records, as images of fake species slowly start to proliferate.
Imagine asking Gemini about the Musket Wars and being told, in not so many words, that it can’t help you because it’d make Māori look bad. Make no mistake. This isn’t about human rights or “te Tiriti”. It’s a blatant power grab.
I really don’t see any room for universities. Don’t feel sorry for them. They did this to themselves.
The cameras are watching. The databases are growing. The networks are connecting. Unless we act now, there may soon be nowhere left to go without the government knowing exactly where we have been.
I wouldn’t quite call critics of AI luddites. I’d call them more ‘reluctant adopters’. And there is no more clearer example of this than software developers.
Data centres or ‘net zero’ – you can’t have both.
Suddenly, the HR Karens are worried that THEIR jobs are next.
It’s a serious argument, and it deserves a serious response – not from theologians, but from the people designing kill-webs and autonomous targeting systems and compressed decision architectures.
We should applaud the government for having the nerve to announce the tough decisions. But announcements don’t matter that much. Execution and delivery are critical. The world is moving. We need to get going.