Table of Contents
As I’ve written several times lately, there is a concerted effort by the legacy media and woke academia to undermine the legitimacy of indigenous European populations. Ahistorical garbage TV series depict Europe as thriving with, indeed founded by, sub-Saharan Africans. Dodgy ‘scientific studies’ make ludicrous claims about ‘black Britons’ and that the builders of Stonehenge were ‘dark-skinned’.
It’s all garbage, of course. The ‘first black Briton’ was white, with blonde hair and blue eyes. The builders of Stonehenge were likely pale-skinned.
In fact, all indigenous Europeans are likely descended from three ancestral populations – not from Africa, but from near-eastern Eurasia.
The modern European gene pool was formed when three ancient populations mixed within the last 7,000 years, Nature journal reports.
Blue-eyed, swarthy hunters mingled with brown-eyed, pale skinned farmers as the latter swept into Europe from the Near East.
But another, mysterious population with Siberian affinities also contributed to the genetic landscape of the continent […]
Agriculture originated in the Near East – in modern Syria, Iraq and Israel – before expanding into Europe around 7,500 years ago.
Multiple lines of evidence suggested this new way of life was spread by a wave of migrants, who interbred with the indigenous European hunter-gatherers they encountered on the way.
Linguistic evidence also suggests that Europeans originated from what is today southern Russia.
Proto-Indo-European […] is the common ancestor of all the languages that belong to the Indo-European language family, which include English, Hindi, Persian, and hundreds of others […]
Archaeological, linguistic, and genetic evidence suggests that a nomadic Bronze Age culture called the Yamnaya, who built massive burial mounds known as kurgans in the steppe north of the Black Sea, spoke a form of Proto-Indo-European.
So, where did the Yamnaya come from?
A new DNA study of more than 400 ancient people from eastern Ukraine and southern Russia shows that both the Yamnaya and ancestral Hittite speakers descended from an eclectic Eneolithic, or Copper Age (ca. 4500–3300 b.c.), population of steppe nomads and farmers from the north Caucasus […] these Proto-Indo-European speakers, whose ancestors went on to spread their languages across Eurasia, originally descended from a small clan of perhaps just 2,000 people living in what is now eastern Ukraine.
Indeed, the earliest human occupation of Europe, before even our species Homo sapiens evolved, came not from the south, but from the east. The cradle of European humanity appears to have been what is today Ukraine and southern Russia.
New findings, published in Nature, by an international team led by the Nuclear Physics Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences have confirmed that stone tools at Korolevo are 1.4 million years old […]
The data from Korolevo adds to an emerging picture of the earliest human occupation of Europe that also includes archaeology and fossils from the sites of Artapuerca and Orce in Spain. Originally it was thought that this occupation may have come from northern Africa across the straits of Gibraltar, but the evidence from Korolevo instead suggests that they came from eastern Europe.
Not only does all of this demolish the conceits of modern media and woke academia, but it poses some interesting questions. After all, if these Indo-European peoples originated in the north Caucasus – around the Black and Caspian seas, what is now southern Russia – what does that imply for the modern-day subcontinental populations?
